Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video79 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Action Committees results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 69.6% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 875 faulty-reasoning hits from 316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (98 of 37,536 keywords). This Political Action Committees is worse (more manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Political Action Committees
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 316
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

100% percentile
025507510099.7% percentile
30.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles316 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 52.2%52.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 69.6%69.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 31.6%31.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 49.0%49.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 28.5%28.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 14.2%14.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 69.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 52.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 49.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 31.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 28.5%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos