Keyword summary
58% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Polestar results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 489 hits . Analysis detected 4,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,676 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,561 of 37,334 keywords). This Polestar is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Polestar
Keyword details
Total words: 5,676
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst