Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Plastic Reduction results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 411 hits. Analysis detected 2,906 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (30,773 of 37,536 keywords). This Plastic Reduction is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group.
Plastic Reduction
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
18%Plastic Reduction (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,700
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

18% percentile
025507510018.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos