Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Plaintiffs Lawyers results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 682 hits. Analysis detected 2,927 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,163 of 37,536 keywords). This Plaintiffs Lawyers is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
Plaintiffs Lawyers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
65%Plaintiffs Lawyers (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,252
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510064.9% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 30.3%30.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos