Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,282 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ping Pong results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Self-Serving Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 585 hits . Analysis detected 3,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,211 of 37,536 keywords). This Ping Pong is worse (more manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group. Ping Pong
Keyword details
Total words: 2,564
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.8% percentile 6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 22.8% 22.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 20.9% 20.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 22.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst