Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,040 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pierre Ambroise Choderlos De Laclos results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,015 hits . Analysis detected 7,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of â 44% (21,091 of 37,536 keywords). This Pierre Ambroise Choderlos De Laclos is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group. Pierre Ambroise Choderlos De Laclos
Keyword details
Total words: 8,160
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst