Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philippines Japan Relations results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Primacy Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.4% saturation with 1,102 hits . Analysis detected 4,116 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,596 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,599 of 35,646 keywords). This Philippines Japan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Philippines Japan Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 2,596
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.9% percentile 7.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 40.2% 40.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 42.5% 42.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 42.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 40.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 0.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst