Keyword summary
ā 56% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Scott results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 733 hits . Analysis detected 2,401 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,764 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ā 23% (29,207 of 37,536 keywords). This Phil Scott is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Phil Scott
Keyword details
Total words: 4,764
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst