Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Phil Mendelson results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 133 hits . Analysis detected 1,155 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,218 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Phil Mendelson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Phil Mendelson
Keyword details
Total words: 1,218
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst