Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pharmaceutical Investment results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Overconfidence Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 686 hits . Analysis detected 4,656 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of 95% (2,150 of 37,536 keywords). This Pharmaceutical Investment is worse (more manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Pharmaceutical Investment
Keyword details
Total words: 2,220
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.3% percentile 9.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 21.4% 21.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 30.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Straw Man: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst