Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pete Davidson results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Unattributed Quote , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 900 hits . Analysis detected 7,309 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,585 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,645 of 37,536 keywords). This Pete Davidson is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Pete Davidson
Keyword details
Total words: 4,585
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.6% percentile 4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst