Keyword summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pet Etiquette results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Ad Hominem , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 220 hits . Analysis detected 1,181 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,395 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (10,602 of 36,456 keywords). This Pet Etiquette is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. Pet Etiquette
Keyword details
Total words: 1,395
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.9% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst