Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Permanent Residency results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Status Quo Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 532 hits. Analysis detected 3,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (11,150 of 37,536 keywords). This Permanent Residency is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Permanent Residency
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
71%Permanent Residency (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,160
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 16.8%16.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos