Trump administration to force foreigners in the U.S. to apply for a green card abroad 43%

By The Associated Press63%

5/23/2026, 7:47:03 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 306 hits. Analysis detected 1,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 790 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.5% and a BS Rank of 43% (12,601 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON  Foreigners in the U.S. who want a green card will need to leave and apply in their home country, the Trump administration announced Friday, in a surprise change to a longstanding policy that sowed confusion and concern among aid groups, immigration lawyers and immigrants. 
For over half a century, foreign nationals with legal status have been able to apply for and complete the entire process for permanent residence in the United States  including individuals married to U.S. citizens, holders of work and student visas, and refugees and political asylum seekers, among others. 
The announcement from U.S. 
Citizenship and Immigration Services said foreigners who are in the U.S. temporarily and who want to apply to become lawful permanent residents, or green card holders, have to return home and apply there, except in "extraordinary circumstances." 
USCIS officers would decide whether applicants meet those. 
"Nonimmigrants, like students, temporary workers, or people on tourist visas, come to the U.S. for a short time and for a specific purpose. 
Our system is designed for them to leave when their visit is over. 
Their visit should not function as the first step in the Green Card process," the agency said in a statement. 
It is the latest step by the Trump administration making legal immigration more difficult for foreigners already in the U.S. and for those hoping to come here. 
"The goal of this policy is very explicit. 
Senior officials in this administration have said over and over that they want fewer people to get permanent residency because permanent residency is a path to citizenship and they want to block that path for as many people as possible," said Doug Rand, a former senior advisor at USCIS during the Biden administration, who added that about 600,000 people already in the U.S. apply each year for a green card. 
USCIS did not say when the change would come into effect, whether individuals would be required to remain in another country throughout the entire process, or whether the policy impacts foreigners whose green card applications are already underway. 
In an emailed statement to the Associated Press the agency said people who provide an "economic benefit" or "national interest" could likely stay in the U.S. while others would have to go abroad to apply. 
The changes come on top of steps the administration has already taken to restrict and limit entry for people from dozens of countries. 
In some cases, there are outright bans on travel from those countries, while people from others face pauses in visa processing. 
Experts and attorneys warned that forcing people from those countries to return home to apply for a green card would result in them being barred from coming back. 
"If families are told that the non-citizen family member must return to his or her country of origin to process their immigrant visa, but immigrant visas are not being processed there, it's a Catch-22. 
These policies will effectively create an indefinite separation of families," wrote World Relief, a humanitarian and refugee resettlement organization. 
USCIS described the change as a return to "the original intent of the law" and closing a "loophole." 
But immigration lawyers and aid groups pushed back, saying it was longstanding practice for many groups to be able to adjust their status in the U.S. and that many people couldn't return home because it wasn't safe or they had no embassy to apply at. 
The U.S. 
Embassy in Afghanistan, for example, has been closed since the U.S. pullout in August 2021. 
"USCIS is trying to upend decades of processing of adjustment of status," said Shev Dalal-Dheini, senior director of government relations at the American Immigration Lawyers Association. 
"This all applies very broadly to anyone seeking a green card". 
Among them could be individuals married to U.S. citizens, immigrants with humanitarian protection who are applying for a green card, and holders of work visas  including doctors and professionals  as well as student and religious visa holders, the attorney noted. 
At some U.S. consulates abroad, wait times for a visa appointment could take up to more than a year, said Dalal-Dheini. 
Immigration attorneys were picking through the policy memo and announcement Friday afternoon, trying to decipher who it would apply to. 
Organizations that provide legal and other assistance to immigrants said they were hearing from clients concerned about what the new guidance would mean for them. 
"It's really hard to tell how this is going to be applied," said Jessie De Haven, senior staff attorney with the California Immigration Project a non profit that provides legal services to low income immigrants. 
"I do think it might have a chilling effect on people applying." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.5%The Associated Press: 2.8%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias10.5%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.4%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%The Associated Press: 3.2%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic2.7%This article: 5.3%The Associated Press: 0.9%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic5.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%The Associated Press: 1.8%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 6.8%The Associated Press: 11.1%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect6.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 14.2%The Associated Press: 0.7%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias14.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.1%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%The Associated Press: 1.7%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias5.9%This article: 38.7%The Associated Press: 11.0%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias38.7%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.2%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%The Associated Press: 2.2%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.0%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.9%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.3%The Associated Press: 2.0%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.9%The Associated Press: 3.8%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority8.9%This article: 4.3%The Associated Press: 1.2%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma4.3%This article: 5.3%The Associated Press: 0.8%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope5.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.7%The Associated Press: 3.0%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization7.7%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 5.6%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.1%The Associated Press: 2.8%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.1%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.3%The Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature2.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.7%The Associated Press: 1.3%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal7.7%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.1%The Associated Press: 1.7%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.1%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.4%The Associated Press: 1.8%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote2.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.3%The Associated Press: 3.9%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice6.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

790 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers49%attributed speech400writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services • 23 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services • 13 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Rand • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Rand • 70 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageAssociated Press • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWorld Relief • 19 words • 100.0% coverageU.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageShev Dalal-Dheini • 26 words • 0.0% coverageShev Dalal-Dheini • 11 words • 0.0% coverageShev Dalal-Dheini • 42 words • 0.0% coverageShev Dalal-Dheini • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJessie De Haven • 35 words • 0.0% coverageJessie De Haven • 12 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

World Relief

100%flagged-word coverage
19 attributed words4.9% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%World Relief: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.5 ptsWriter: 9.5%World Relief: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.