Keyword summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video466 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Special Pleading, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 222 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (40,892 of 55,033 keywords). This Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,864
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510025.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos