Keyword summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video1,163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pennsylvania Budget Deal Josh Shapiro results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 453 hits. Analysis detected 2,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (25,711 of 37,536 keywords). This Pennsylvania Budget Deal Josh Shapiro is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Pennsylvania Budget Deal Josh Shapiro
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,652
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510031.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Middle Ground: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos