BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 1,625 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,163 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (15,002 of 21,197 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the article peer group.

TheĀ PennsylvaniaĀ StateĀ CapitolĀ onĀ CommonwealthĀ AvenueĀ inĀ HarrisburgĀ Aug.Ā 
26,Ā 2025.Ā 
ReadĀ moreĀ TomĀ GralishĀ /Ā StaffĀ PhotographerĀ 
byĀ GillianĀ McGoldrickĀ 
UpdatedĀ JulyĀ 12,Ā 2026,Ā 6:28Ā p.m.Ā 
ETĀ 
PublishedĀ JulyĀ 12,Ā 2026,Ā 5:21Ā p.m.Ā 
ETĀ 
HARRISBURG — Gov.Ā 
JoshĀ ShapiroĀ signedĀ aĀ $50.8Ā billionĀ stateĀ budgetĀ onĀ SundayĀ followingĀ theĀ rushedĀ passageĀ ofĀ theĀ overallĀ dealĀ byĀ theĀ GeneralĀ AssemblyĀ thatĀ lawmakersĀ saidĀ helpsĀ addressĀ theĀ state’sĀ affordabilityĀ crisisĀ butĀ delaysĀ actionĀ onĀ someĀ ofĀ theĀ mostĀ significantĀ issuesĀ beforeĀ theĀ legislature.Ā 
TheĀ agreement,Ā whichĀ wasĀ dueĀ atĀ theĀ beginningĀ ofĀ theĀ monthĀ ,Ā marksĀ anĀ improvementĀ fromĀ lastĀ year’sĀ nearlyĀ five-monthĀ budgetĀ impasseĀ inĀ theĀ splitĀ legislatureĀ thatĀ requiredĀ schoolĀ districts,Ā counties,Ā andĀ socialĀ serviceĀ providersĀ toĀ takeĀ outĀ expensiveĀ loansĀ orĀ closeĀ altogetherĀ .Ā 
ā€œWeĀ managed,Ā asĀ theĀ [voteĀ count]Ā indicates,Ā toĀ findĀ compromiseĀ withoutĀ compromisingĀ ourĀ coreĀ values,ā€Ā ShapiroĀ saidĀ duringĀ aĀ newsĀ conferenceĀ SundayĀ evening,Ā beforeĀ signingĀ hisĀ fourthĀ budgetĀ asĀ Pennsylvania’sĀ governor.Ā 
TheĀ dealĀ wasĀ hashedĀ outĀ overĀ weeksĀ inĀ closed-doorĀ meetingsĀ amongĀ topĀ leadersĀ andĀ includesĀ newĀ transparencyĀ requirementsĀ forĀ dataĀ centers,Ā publiclyĀ fundedĀ housingĀ projects,Ā andĀ publicĀ transitĀ agencies.Ā 
LawmakersĀ alsoĀ agreedĀ toĀ aĀ long-soughtĀ cost-of-livingĀ adjustmentĀ totalingĀ approximatelyĀ $168Ā millionĀ perĀ yearĀ forĀ someĀ PennsylvaniaĀ retiredĀ teachers,Ā policeĀ officers,Ā andĀ firefighters — someĀ ofĀ whomĀ haveĀ notĀ seenĀ anĀ increaseĀ toĀ theirĀ monthlyĀ pensionĀ paymentsĀ inĀ moreĀ thanĀ 20Ā years.Ā 
MoreĀ educationĀ funding,Ā dataĀ centerĀ requirementsĀ 
PennsylvaniaĀ willĀ haveĀ investedĀ nearlyĀ $2Ā billionĀ inĀ newĀ schoolĀ fundingĀ throughĀ itsĀ adequacyĀ andĀ taxĀ equityĀ formulasĀ sinceĀ 2024.Ā 
That’sĀ whenĀ lawmakersĀ firstĀ employedĀ theĀ newĀ calculationsĀ toĀ closeĀ aĀ $4Ā billionĀ ā€œadequacyĀ gapā€Ā afterĀ aĀ landmarkĀ courtĀ rulingĀ thatĀ foundĀ theĀ stateĀ wasĀ illegallyĀ underfundingĀ studentsĀ inĀ low-incomeĀ districtsĀ .Ā 
ThisĀ year’sĀ installmentĀ ofĀ adequacyĀ fundingĀ toppedĀ $650Ā million,Ā asĀ partĀ ofĀ anĀ effortĀ toĀ preventĀ districtsĀ fromĀ havingĀ toĀ raiseĀ propertyĀ taxesĀ onĀ alreadyĀ low-incomeĀ residents.Ā 
TheĀ additionalĀ investmentĀ sendsĀ $157Ā millionĀ moreĀ thisĀ yearĀ toĀ theĀ SchoolĀ DistrictĀ ofĀ PhiladelphiaĀ .Ā 
LegislativeĀ leadersĀ failedĀ toĀ agreeĀ inĀ theĀ finalĀ budgetĀ onĀ otherĀ issuesĀ thatĀ haveĀ seenĀ broadĀ supportĀ inĀ bothĀ chambers,Ā suchĀ asĀ repealingĀ aĀ salesĀ taxĀ exemptionĀ forĀ dataĀ centerĀ projects,Ā allowingĀ localĀ moratoriumsĀ onĀ dataĀ centerĀ projects,Ā orĀ banningĀ cellĀ phonesĀ inĀ K-12Ā schoolsĀ .Ā 
TheyĀ mayĀ revisitĀ theĀ issuesĀ duringĀ theĀ fallĀ legislativeĀ session.Ā 
Instead,Ā theyĀ approvedĀ aĀ newĀ reportingĀ requirementĀ thatĀ willĀ forceĀ dataĀ centersĀ toĀ submitĀ annualĀ reportsĀ detailingĀ theirĀ waterĀ andĀ energyĀ usage.Ā 
TheĀ companiesĀ willĀ faceĀ aĀ $10,000-a-dayĀ fineĀ forĀ failingĀ toĀ submitĀ theirĀ reports.Ā 
TheĀ GeneralĀ AssemblyĀ alsoĀ votedĀ toĀ closeĀ aĀ sales-taxĀ loopholeĀ thatĀ allowedĀ onlineĀ sellersĀ toĀ avoidĀ payingĀ Philadelphia’sĀ localĀ 2%Ā salesĀ taxĀ onĀ itemsĀ soldĀ inĀ theĀ city.Ā 
MayorĀ CherelleĀ L.Ā 
ParkerĀ hadĀ requestedĀ thatĀ theĀ loopholeĀ beĀ closedĀ asĀ partĀ ofĀ herĀ ownĀ budgetĀ pitchĀ inĀ aĀ moveĀ estimatedĀ toĀ bringĀ anĀ additionalĀ $1.5Ā millionĀ toĀ theĀ city.Ā 
NoĀ decisionĀ onĀ skillĀ gamesĀ 
ButĀ theĀ budgetĀ doesĀ notĀ addressĀ someĀ ofĀ theĀ mostĀ pressingĀ issuesĀ beforeĀ theĀ GeneralĀ Assembly,Ā includingĀ whetherĀ toĀ taxĀ andĀ regulateĀ skillĀ gamesĀ orĀ allowĀ theĀ moreĀ thanĀ 70,000Ā gamblingĀ machinesĀ inĀ PennsylvaniaĀ bars,Ā cornerĀ storesĀ andĀ fraternalĀ organizationsĀ toĀ becomeĀ illegalĀ comeĀ October.Ā 
TheĀ stateĀ hasĀ untilĀ thenĀ toĀ decideĀ howĀ toĀ approachĀ theĀ machinesĀ afterĀ theĀ state’sĀ SupremeĀ CourtĀ lastĀ monthĀ determinedĀ thatĀ skillĀ games,Ā whichĀ haveĀ forĀ yearsĀ operatedĀ inĀ aĀ legalĀ grayĀ area,Ā areĀ slotĀ machinesĀ andĀ shouldĀ beĀ regulatedĀ asĀ such.Ā 
TheyĀ alsoĀ puntedĀ onĀ findingĀ aĀ long-termĀ fundingĀ solutionĀ toĀ fundĀ massĀ transitĀ untilĀ nextĀ year,Ā whenĀ aĀ two-yearĀ fail-safeĀ runsĀ out.Ā 
» READĀ MORE:Ā HowĀ ā€˜skillĀ games’ explodedĀ acrossĀ Pennsylvania — andĀ sparkedĀ aĀ multimillion-dollarĀ politicalĀ fightĀ 
Shapiro,Ā aĀ first-termĀ DemocratĀ facingĀ reelectionĀ thisĀ year,Ā proposedĀ aĀ $53.3Ā budgetĀ inĀ FebruaryĀ thatĀ forĀ aĀ fourthĀ timeĀ emphasizedĀ topĀ DemocraticĀ initiativesĀ suchĀ asĀ raisingĀ theĀ stateĀ minimumĀ wageĀ toĀ $15Ā perĀ hourĀ orĀ legalizingĀ recreationalĀ marijuana.Ā 
HeĀ alsoĀ proposedĀ otherĀ initiatives,Ā suchĀ asĀ aĀ $1Ā billionĀ criticalĀ infrastructureĀ fundĀ toĀ helpĀ theĀ stateĀ driveĀ outĀ publicĀ dollarsĀ toĀ buildĀ moreĀ housingĀ andĀ energyĀ generation,Ā whichĀ didĀ notĀ seeĀ fundingĀ inĀ theĀ finalĀ budgetĀ deal.Ā 
StateĀ Sen.Ā 
NikilĀ SavalĀ (D.,Ā Philadelphia)Ā wasĀ amongĀ theĀ twoĀ DemocratsĀ whoĀ opposedĀ theĀ stateĀ budget,Ā inĀ partĀ becauseĀ itĀ didĀ notĀ makeĀ theĀ ambitiousĀ investmentsĀ neededĀ toĀ addressĀ theĀ state’sĀ limitedĀ affordableĀ housingĀ stock.Ā 
ā€œWeĀ cannotĀ deferĀ atĀ thisĀ moment,ā€Ā addedĀ Saval,Ā theĀ chairĀ ofĀ theĀ PhiladelphiaĀ delegationĀ inĀ theĀ Senate,Ā inĀ hisĀ floorĀ remarksĀ beforeĀ theĀ vote.Ā 
LawmakersĀ alsoĀ declinedĀ toĀ createĀ anyĀ newĀ generatorsĀ ofĀ revenueĀ forĀ Pennsylvania,Ā andĀ deferredĀ addressingĀ theĀ state’sĀ multibillionĀ dollarĀ structuralĀ deficitĀ untilĀ futureĀ years.Ā 
TheĀ overallĀ dealĀ passedĀ withĀ bipartisanĀ supportĀ inĀ theĀ GOP-controlledĀ Senate,Ā 44-6,Ā andĀ inĀ theĀ House,Ā whereĀ DemocratsĀ holdĀ aĀ narrowĀ majority,Ā 167-35.Ā 
ā€œWeĀ haveĀ metĀ inĀ theĀ middle,ā€Ā saidĀ SenateĀ MajorityĀ LeaderĀ JoeĀ PittmanĀ (R.,Ā Indiana).Ā 
ā€œIĀ amĀ proudĀ ofĀ thisĀ product,Ā despiteĀ whatĀ someĀ naysayersĀ mayĀ say.ā€Ā 
TheĀ 2026-27Ā budget,Ā whichĀ isĀ aĀ 1.4%Ā increaseĀ inĀ spendingĀ overĀ theĀ priorĀ fiscalĀ year,Ā hasĀ noĀ widespreadĀ taxĀ increases.Ā 
ItĀ alsoĀ largelyĀ reliesĀ onĀ accountingĀ maneuversĀ likeĀ spendingĀ downĀ unusedĀ orĀ underusedĀ dedicatedĀ fundsĀ toĀ addressĀ theĀ structuralĀ deficitĀ insteadĀ ofĀ pullingĀ fromĀ theĀ state’sĀ emergencyĀ savingsĀ account.Ā 
OneĀ ofĀ theĀ accountingĀ movesĀ toĀ balanceĀ Pennsylvania’sĀ budgetĀ includesĀ delayingĀ twoĀ monthsĀ ofĀ paymentsĀ totalingĀ $1.3Ā billionĀ toĀ insuranceĀ companiesĀ thatĀ fulfillĀ theĀ state’sĀ ballooningĀ MedicaidĀ programsĀ untilĀ theĀ nextĀ fiscalĀ year.Ā 
WithoutĀ thoseĀ delayedĀ payments,Ā theĀ budgetĀ wouldĀ totalĀ closerĀ toĀ $52.1Ā billion.Ā 
SeveralĀ GOPĀ HouseĀ membersĀ opposedĀ theĀ budget,Ā arguingĀ itĀ isĀ unbalancedĀ andĀ onlyĀ postponesĀ taxĀ increasesĀ toĀ futureĀ yearsĀ ifĀ spendingĀ isn’tĀ cut.Ā 
StateĀ Rep.Ā 
BradĀ RoaeĀ (R.,Ā Crawford),Ā calledĀ theĀ finalĀ budgetĀ aĀ ā€œfakeĀ number.ā€Ā 
StateĀ Rep.Ā 
CharityĀ GrimmĀ KrupaĀ (R.,Ā Fayette)Ā calledĀ itĀ ā€œvoodooĀ math.ā€Ā 
AndĀ StateĀ Rep.Ā 
MarcĀ AndersonĀ (R.,Ā York)Ā saidĀ theĀ stateĀ wasĀ ā€œcookingĀ theĀ books.ā€Ā 
ButĀ broadly,Ā bothĀ DemocraticĀ andĀ RepublicanĀ membersĀ calledĀ theĀ budgetĀ aĀ reasonableĀ compromise,Ā acknowledgingĀ thatĀ theyĀ willĀ haveĀ additionalĀ workĀ toĀ doĀ inĀ theĀ fallĀ legislativeĀ sessionĀ andĀ duringĀ nextĀ year’sĀ budgetĀ negotiationsĀ toĀ balanceĀ theĀ state’sĀ finances.Ā 
DuringĀ speechesĀ onĀ theĀ SenateĀ floor,Ā severalĀ RepublicanĀ senatorsĀ quotedĀ TheĀ RollingĀ Stones’ songĀ ā€œYouĀ Can’tĀ AlwaysĀ GetĀ WhatĀ YouĀ Want,ā€Ā emphasizingĀ theĀ secondĀ halfĀ ofĀ theĀ refrain:Ā ā€œYouĀ mightĀ findĀ youĀ getĀ whatĀ youĀ need.ā€Ā 
StateĀ Rep.Ā 
JordanĀ HarrisĀ (D.,Ā Philadelphia)Ā alsoĀ turnedĀ toĀ musicĀ toĀ representĀ hisĀ positionĀ onĀ theĀ budgetĀ deal,Ā paraphrasingĀ AnthonyĀ Hamilton’sĀ ā€œDoĀ YouĀ FeelĀ Meā€Ā asĀ aĀ responseĀ toĀ hisĀ constituents’ concernsĀ aboutĀ affordabilityĀ byĀ sendingĀ moreĀ stateĀ dollarsĀ toĀ schoolĀ districtsĀ toĀ helpĀ themĀ avoidĀ propertyĀ taxĀ increasesĀ andĀ raisingĀ monthlyĀ pensionĀ paymentsĀ forĀ retirees.Ā 
ā€œIĀ amĀ gladĀ toĀ standĀ todayĀ toĀ supportĀ it,Ā toĀ letĀ theĀ peopleĀ ofĀ PennsylvaniaĀ know,Ā baby,Ā theĀ messageĀ isĀ gettingĀ through,ā€Ā HarrisĀ added.Ā 
PennsylvaniaĀ LegislativeĀ Correspondents’ AssociationĀ InternĀ EthanĀ YoungĀ contributedĀ toĀ thisĀ article.Ā 
I'mĀ theĀ HarrisburgĀ reporter,Ā coveringĀ stateĀ governmentĀ andĀ politics — andĀ howĀ theĀ twoĀ intersectĀ toĀ impactĀ theĀ livesĀ ofĀ Pennsylvania'sĀ residents.Ā 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.2%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.5%Inquirer.com: 2.0%Confirmation Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.7%Inquirer.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Gillian McGoldrick: 2.0%Inquirer.com: 2.4%Availability Heuristic1.4%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.8%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%Gillian McGoldrick: 8.4%Inquirer.com: 5.2%Framing Effect13.6%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.5%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.5%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.7%Inquirer.com: 2.6%Optimism Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.9%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 23.4%Gillian McGoldrick: 7.6%Inquirer.com: 5.6%Negativity Bias23.4%This article: 11.4%Gillian McGoldrick: 3.0%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias11.4%This article: 2.8%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.0%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error2.8%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.2%Inquirer.com: 1.3%In-Group Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 4.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.3%Inquirer.com: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.4%Gillian McGoldrick: 2.9%Inquirer.com: 2.2%Appeal to Authority6.4%This article: 3.9%Gillian McGoldrick: 2.4%Inquirer.com: 1.1%False Dilemma3.9%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 2.7%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning2.7%This article: 7.1%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.4%Inquirer.com: 3.1%Hasty Generalization7.1%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.4%Bandwagon2.0%This article: 13.3%Gillian McGoldrick: 4.3%Inquirer.com: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion13.3%This article: 2.1%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.8%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Begging the Question2.1%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 1.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque1.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.8%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature2.8%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.9%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.0%Inquirer.com: 2.0%Anecdotal0.9%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.0%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.2%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Middle Ground7.2%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.1%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 1.2%Unattributed Quote2.1%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 1.4%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.9%Gillian McGoldrick: 2.1%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Biased Writer Voice13.9%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 3.3%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Gillian McGoldrick: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.4%

1163 words analyzed.

Speakers

10speakers20%attributed speech929writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Shapiro • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGillian McGoldrick • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Shapiro • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageCherelle L. Parker • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageNikil Saval • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Pittman • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Pittman • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageBrad Roae • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageCharity Grimm Krupa • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageMarc Anderson • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Harris • 54 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Harris • 24 words • 0.0% coveragePennsylvania Legislative Correspondents’ Association • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Marc Anderson

100%flagged-word coverage
11 attributed words4.7% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-17.4 ptsWriter: 17.4%Marc Anderson: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-4.1 ptsWriter: 4.1%Marc Anderson: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Marc Anderson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.