Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,327 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Penguins results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,096 hits . Analysis detected 6,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,272 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,841 of 37,536 keywords). This Penguins is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Penguins
Keyword details
Total words: 7,272
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst