Keyword summary
â 10% 1 analyzed article/video 764 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pell Grant results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 161 hits . Analysis detected 776 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of â 6% (53,580 of 56,578 keywords). This Pell Grant is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group. Pell Grant
Keyword details
Total words: 3,056
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.3% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst