Keyword summary
⁠10%1 analyzed article/video764 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pell Grant results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 161 hits. Analysis detected 776 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (53,580 of 56,578 keywords). This Pell Grant is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Pell Grant
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠6%Pell Grant (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,056
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751005.3% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos