Keyword summary
26% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,909 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pedro Pascal results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 2,747 hits . Analysis detected 16,549 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,623 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (29,857 of 35,898 keywords). This Pedro Pascal is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group. Pedro Pascal
Keyword details
Total words: 22,623
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles22.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst