Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 898 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Cook results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 368 hits . Analysis detected 2,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (26,265 of 36,131 keywords). This Paul Cook is better (less manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group. Paul Cook
Keyword details
Total words: 3,592
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst