Keyword summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video1,174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pamela Smith results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 377 hits. Analysis detected 2,794 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,522 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (14,199 of 37,536 keywords). This Pamela Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Pamela Smith
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠63%Pamela Smith (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,522
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

62% percentile
025507510062.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos