Keyword summary
53% 1 analyzed article/video 938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Palestinian Centre For Human Rights results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 579 hits . Analysis detected 4,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (14,847 of 34,791 keywords). This Palestinian Centre For Human Rights is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group. Palestinian Centre For Human Rights
Keyword details
Total words: 3,752
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst