Keyword summary
66% 1 analyzed article/video 1,196 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pair Bonding results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 559 hits . Analysis detected 2,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,509 of 37,536 keywords). This Pair Bonding is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group. Pair Bonding
Keyword details
Total words: 3,588
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.4% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst