Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Package Theft results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 522 hits. Analysis detected 3,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,811 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 81% (7,187 of 37,536 keywords). This Package Theft is worse (more manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Package Theft
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
81%Package Theft (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,811
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

81% percentile
025507510080.9% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 18.6%18.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 15.3%15.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos