Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pacific Palisades results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Confirmation Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 59.1% saturation with 1,315 hits . Analysis detected 6,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,226 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of â 95% (1,885 of 37,536 keywords). This Pacific Palisades is worse (more manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group. Pacific Palisades
Keyword details
Total words: 2,226
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.0% percentile 10.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 54.2% 54.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 59.1% 59.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 27.7% 27.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 26.3% 26.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.1% 18.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Fundamental Attribution E⌠Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 59.1%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 54.2%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 27.7%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 26.3%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst