Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,556 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Overspending results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias , Loss Aversion , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 1,006 hits . Analysis detected 5,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,904 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,833 of 37,326 keywords). This Overspending is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Overspending
Keyword details
Total words: 4,904
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.6% percentile 3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst