Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Overcharged Fans results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 369 hits. Analysis detected 2,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,506 of 37,536 keywords). This Overcharged Fans is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Overcharged Fans
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
59%Overcharged Fans (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,660
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510058.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos