Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Overcharged Fans results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 369 hits . Analysis detected 2,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,506 of 37,536 keywords). This Overcharged Fans is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Overcharged Fans
Keyword details
Total words: 2,660
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst