Keyword summary
42% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,480 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ousmane Dembele results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Recency Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 1,780 hits . Analysis detected 6,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,386 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,124 of 37,536 keywords). This Ousmane Dembele is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group. Ousmane Dembele
Keyword details
Total words: 9,386
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.0% 19.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst