Keyword summary
71% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oslo Accords results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 245 hits . Analysis detected 1,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,386 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (32,242 of 35,590 keywords). This Oslo Accords is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group. Oslo Accords
Keyword details
Total words: 3,386
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst