Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Oscar Winning Film results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 186 hits. Analysis detected 1,189 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Oscar Winning Film is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Oscar Winning Film
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Oscar Winning Film (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,176
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos