Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,538 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oscar Austin results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53.9% saturation with 2,473 hits . Analysis detected 7,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,590 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 89% (3,848 of 35,097 keywords). This Oscar Austin is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group. Oscar Austin
Keyword details
Total words: 4,590
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.0% percentile 6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 53.9% 53.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 20.9% 20.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 26.6% 26.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 53.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst