Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Orforglipron results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 41.1% saturation with 706 hits . Analysis detected 2,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,787 of 37,536 keywords). This Orforglipron is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group. Orforglipron
Keyword details
Total words: 1,716
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.2% percentile 6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 41.1% 41.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 41.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst