Keyword summary
66% 1 analyzed article/video 1,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oregon Forest Fires results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 896 hits . Analysis detected 3,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (17,077 of 37,536 keywords). This Oregon Forest Fires is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. Oregon Forest Fires
Keyword details
Total words: 3,504
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.5% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 25.6% 25.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Red Herring: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst