Keyword summary
11% 1 analyzed article/video 1,667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oral Tradition results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 310 hits . Analysis detected 2,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,001 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,166 of 37,536 keywords). This Oral Tradition is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group. Oral Tradition
Keyword details
Total words: 5,001
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst