Keyword summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Operation Trialblazer results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 300 hits . Analysis detected 2,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,478 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,111 of 37,536 keywords). This Operation Trialblazer is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Operation Trialblazer
Keyword details
Total words: 2,478
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst