Keyword summary
â 39% 1 analyzed article/video 625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Debate results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof , Halo Effect , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 234 hits . Analysis detected 1,638 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,875 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of â 66% (12,986 of 37,536 keywords). This Online Debate is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group. Online Debate
Keyword details
Total words: 1,875
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.4% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 0.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.7% No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst