Keyword summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Access results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 406 hits . Analysis detected 1,997 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,673 of 37,536 keywords). This Online Access is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group. Online Access
Keyword details
Total words: 1,320
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.2% percentile 7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 30.8% 30.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 24.9% 24.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.5% 19.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.3% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% No True Scotsman: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst