Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 896 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olympic Gold results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 635 hits . Analysis detected 3,410 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,615 of 36,204 keywords). This Olympic Gold is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Olympic Gold
Keyword details
Total words: 2,688
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.2% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 23.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst