Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olvera Street results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 140 hits . Analysis detected 839 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (24,954 of 34,833 keywords). This Olvera Street is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Olvera Street
Keyword details
Total words: 2,328
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst