Keyword summary
39%2 analyzed articles/videos2,119 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ollama results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 577 hits. Analysis detected 6,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,304 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (24,659 of 37,536 keywords). This Ollama is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Ollama
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
35%Ollama (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,304
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

34% percentile
025507510034.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos