Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Rodrigo results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 435 hits . Analysis detected 2,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,057 of 37,536 keywords). This Olivia Rodrigo is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. Olivia Rodrigo
Keyword details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.9% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst