Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 356 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Newton John results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 437 hits . Analysis detected 1,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,424 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,692 of 37,536 keywords). This Olivia Newton John is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Olivia Newton John
Keyword details
Total words: 1,424
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.8% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 30.7% 30.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 30.7%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst