Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Old Femail results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 885 hits. Analysis detected 4,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (17,986 of 37,536 keywords). This Old Femail is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Old Femail
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠53%Old Femail (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,888
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510052.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 18.1%18.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos