Keyword summary
46%2 analyzed articles/videos986 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Refineries results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 3,278 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,829 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,231 of 36,832 keywords). This Oil Refineries is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Oil Refineries
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
37%Oil Refineries (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,829
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510036.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.0%6.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos