Keyword summary
6% 1 analyzed article/video 1,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ohio U S Senate Race results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 148 hits . Analysis detected 969 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 14% (45,343 of 52,612 keywords). This Ohio U S Senate Race is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group. Ohio U S Senate Race
Keyword details
Total words: 4,312
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst