Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos367 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Official Misconduct results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 395 hits. Analysis detected 2,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,604 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,337 of 37,536 keywords). This Official Misconduct is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Official Misconduct
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
25%Official Misconduct (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,604
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

25% percentile
025507510024.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate