Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,289 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Officer results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 542 hits. Analysis detected 4,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,156 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (22,737 of 37,536 keywords). This Officer is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Officer
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠40%Officer (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,156
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510039.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos