Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ocean Observatories Initiative results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 194 hits . Analysis detected 1,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,290 keywords). This Ocean Observatories Initiative is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ocean Observatories Initiative
Keyword details
Total words: 3,340
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst