Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 291 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ocean Animals results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 76 hits . Analysis detected 592 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (16,067 of 37,536 keywords). This Ocean Animals is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. Ocean Animals
Keyword details
Total words: 1,164
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.2% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst